Lessons from Camden, Ohio's Water emergency.

Most of the inhabitants of the United States take their overall water safety as a given; sure, some in the desert Southwest ensure that they will need to make choices between what fields to water, but very little to worry about where they will get their drinking water. Imagine if that changed. For the residents of a small town in Western Ohio change it; water supply of their city was so polluted that it was impossible to provide the residents with drinking water and emergency measures had to be introduced. In this, the first of a three-part series, will H2Bid this disaster and its consequences for the city of Camden, Ohio.

Camden (Ohio), is a small town in the southwest corner of the State; in the summer of 2010 Camden residents began to notice that their tap water exhibited a salty taste. Of the city local water service supplied drinking water to about 2,500 residents; This water was drawn from three main good places. The Mayor of the city and the Council wanted to understand what was going on, so she took action to test the water.

In August, 2010, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (UPA) the water tested and determined that one of the three wells showed significant salt and brine contamination and a second well was exhibit signs of rising salt. The first was deemed unfit to drink and was immediately taken out of service. A few weeks later, became the second good decommissioned the third was well taken offline in order to avoid any that heavy use the aquifer would further error. By the fall of 2010, the entire good field was contaminated and deemed unfit to drink.

After the first was well contamination discovered, Camden the Mayor and City Council began immediately distribute bottled water to residents of the city. Each House was assigned a gallon of water per day; households with children had two litres per day. Even with this assistance grew the residents rage; handmade signs ask how this happened is lined the streets and the City Council meetings ended in arguments and screaming. The UPA a couple of those meetings and tried to help the city citizens understand the problems.

The UPA believed that unsecured salt piles on a property is a possible cause of the pollution were. The scientists believe that salt runoff from the stacks flowed in a streambed that dry during the summer months. This water, high in salt concentration, then through the streambed soaked in the aquifer. This contamination probably happened in the course of one or more years, such as the salt piles were first identified in 2009. At that time, the UPA and the city of Camden asked that the salt are treated or deleted; It is plausible that such a cleanup would be excluded from the City field, although it never will be known for certain.

In the autumn of 2010, the city of Camden is faced with difficult choices. The nearest municipal water supply, the Southwest Regional Water system, would be a good alternative for fouled water supply of the city, but it would take several months and an estimated cost of $ 400,000 USD Camden connect to the system. Alternately, the city was drilling exploratory wells in a different area to find out if a new well site field could be established. The cost of the creation of a new field would be less good than connect to the South West regional system, but it was not a certainty that a new, non-contaminated aquifer with enough water volume can be quickly identified.

In two articles explore next month, H2Bid how the infection happened and what is being done to the situation for the residents. In addition to the causes that have led to exploring this city's unfortunate situation, H2Bid will watch what could otherwise be done so that this situation will not repeat in another city. Hopefully these lessons to practice and new processes implemented in time to prevent another Camden be reduced.

H2bidblog

Posted in emergency services

Related Articles